"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
His defense can be summed up this way: pollsters measure public opinion better than any competitor and are a valuable tool for recording and interpreting moments in history (like the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal), understanding the present (even Alan Greenspan consults economic surveys before raising interest rates), and planning for the future (local, state, and federal governments regularly poll constituents before implementing big-ticket projects).
Warren explains the elements that make good polls really good and points the finger at bad polls that either "really 'stink'," such as push polls, or are "ill-fated," such as the Nielsen ratings. He also explains why politicians and the media love (and sometimes hate) opinion polls and depend on them for their survival. (In other words, don't believe it when politicians say they don't pay attention to the polls. While President Bush may not jump at every poll-generated statistic like his predecessor, he would be a fool not to pay attention.)
Warren's favorite defense of opinion polling is that it advances democracy because it promotes popular government, and he looks at its growing use in democratic countries and its failure in totalitarian ones. Occasionally, Warren is blinded by his own enthusiasm (since when have historians been able to understand election results only by using polls results, and how many people really use them to "fit in"?),and he is clearly a better pollster than writer. Still, were the readers of this book to be polled on how well it does its job, the majority would give it a thumbs-up. --Lesley Reed
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
US$ 3.99
Within U.S.A.
Book Description hardcover. Condition: New. BRAND NEWOver 1,000,000 satisfied customers since 1997! Choose expedited shipping (if available) for much faster delivery. Delivery confirmation on all US orders. Seller Inventory # 10456206