"Sherry makes a dazzling case.... It is still all too rare for critics to read Modernist literature in the context of its historical period, and Sherry's work in that direction is to be warmly welcomed."--
Times Literary Supplement"'Armed force,' notes Vincent Sherry at the beginning of his powerful and learned revisionist study, 'appears in Liberal tradition as the chief type of unreason.' Yet in 1914, the Liberal Establishment in England found a way of justifying World War I as nothing short of an ethical enterprise--the defense of 'civilization' itself against the forces of irrationalism, anarchy, and decay. Indeed, Sherry argues, once we understand the Great War as inherently the War of Liberal Rationalism, literary modernism can be understood as the reaction to that Rationalism, especially to the rationalist, mentalist conception of language. In a series of daring and sometimes controversial readings, especially of Eliot, Pound, and Woolf, Sherry shows how this process worked itself out in the Modernist masterpieces of the period. His is a sobering account and one that has startling implications for our own historical moment."--Marjorie Perloff, Stanford University
"The story of English liberalism is usually narrated with reference to works of literature that eschew stylistic experimentation--works that tell the story themselves. Vincent Sherry does something more dazzling. By focusing on the language of liberalism, he shows how Pound, Eliot, and Woolf responded to the disintegration of liberal values by imitating, exaggerating, and parodying that disintegration within the linguistic texture of their own work. This is historical criticism turned into a high-wire performance: language is pushed to the proscenium, and we are made to feel the historicity of precise turns in syntax, grammar, and diction."--James Longenbach, University of Rochester
"Sherry's book offers a learned, elegant, intricate, and intriguing argument about the collapse of liberal languages of rationality under the pressure of WW I, so that he can suggest a set of historical pressures on the emerging of modernist efforts to decompose and recompose prevailing models for determining social values. The result is an extraordinary weaving of the historian's skills with the modes of attention fostered by literary criticism." --Charles Altieri, University of California, Berkeley